Author: Paul Orlando

  • Are the TechStars Results accurate?

    I have total respect for TechStars and what I know about it tells me it’s a great program.

    So when I recently saw TechStars’ results page with a 80% success rate I had to learn more. I’m always very interested in “success/failure” at startups so I looked through their list of previous classes, going back to when they started in 2007. First thing I noticed was that the list might be out of date (ToVieFor from the most recent class is still shown as active).

    First a word on how I gathered the data.
    TechStars lists company status as either Active, Failed, or Acquired. But after I started to look, I saw a lot of companies that were listed as Active, but didn’t seem to be so. So I started a 4th category called “Inactive” and began to look at the list.

    Since I didn’t have any inside info and company founders don’t take kindly to strangers emailing and asking “hey, you still doing this startup or what?” I used publicly available information. I marked a company as inactive if they shared a couple of these traits: blog hasn’t been updated for over 1 year (many were more than 2 years old), has a Twitter account but no activity, has a Facebook account but no activity, the site doesn’t exist anymore (that was the easy one), the site is still a landing page just collecting emails even after more than a year.

    I also only looked at the first five TechStars classes, since any newer company hasn’t had a real opportunity to succeed or fail yet.

    I’m probably not totally accurate in the list, so take it as a list of who “appears” to be Inactive based on information online.

    This is TechStars data for the first five classes.

    And when I add the 9 companies (listed at bottom) that appear to not be Active, I get the results below.

    This takes the TechStars from an Active + Acquired average of 84% for those classes down to 66%. If you look only at Active companies, then it goes from 67% down to 49%.

    If anyone has better data, contact me and I’ll be happy to update this. To make it easier for you to make corrections, these are the 9 extra companies that seemed to be inactive: J Squared Media, BuyPlayWin, Peoples Software Company, LangoLab, TempMine, Mailana, Rezora, Monkey Analytics, TutorialTab, Sparkcloud. (Sorry for any mistakes.)

    I wrote this to learn about startup longevity rates, not to upset anyone. And I know that sometimes startups look inactive but there are other things going on.

  • Steve Blank quote

    Steve Blank quote from GigaOm video interview: “I did this at SXSW. I said ‘There are 500 people in this room. The good news is, in ten years, there’s two of you who are going to make $100 Million dollars. The rest of you, you might as well have been working at Wal-Mart for how much you’re going to make.’ And everybody laughs. And I said, ‘No, no, that’s not the joke. The joke is all of you are looking at the other guys feeling sorry for those poor son-of-a-bitches.’”

  • Some things that will help you learn how to improve your startup

    Recently, a couple people in the Startups Unplugged class asked me to take a more formal descriptive approach and talk about the general principles that help you learn how to improve your startup. I’m including some personal experiences from when I was building my startup Chatfe (these are mostly examples of things that didn’t go well).

    Here are some recommended major activities for you that will positively impact your work.

    Customer Discovery activities (do you really know your customers?)
    – Talk to people in your target market. What is their daily life like? What are their biggest problems? These are extremely powerful things to understand. You can learn from customers without asking them outright what to do (they often can’t tell you anyway).
    – If they could change anything about what they do, what would it be?
    – When you first talk to people, focus on their problems, not your proposed features (which may need to completely change).
    – Observation of users is needed and totally different from looking at analytics. Go to friends, other startup people and best, total strangers to observe them using your service. Take notes, ask questions and use what you learn to improve.
    – You can learn a lot before you build anything. So don’t build until needed; use wireframes to save time.

    – Be flexible enough to change when what you learn is different from your initial vision. You do need to start with a vision, but sometimes your starting vision will be revealed as a hallucination.
    – Be open to pivoting (major change in your service or direction), which is something most startups do at least once. It’s tough, but better to do this earlier than when it’s too late.
    – Build-Measure-Learn methodology. Think of this in reverse order. First figure out what you want to learn, then figure out what you have to measure in order to learn that, then what you must build in order to measure. For example, if you want to learn if people want your new service you don’t need to build it first to test that. Instead, you could see what % of visitors sign up on a test landing page. And Build-Measure-Learn is not a one-time event, but something you keep doing.

    My experience:
    – I learned a lot about user behavior through direct observation of first-time users, but didn’t always capture or apply the data. Apart from myself, I had multiple people using the same form to gather data but not everyone was detail oriented or comfortable asking questions, which meant I lost data and wasted time.
    – We tied ourselves to a single way of doing things because we had already spent time building it. Based on what we learned it would have been easier in the long-run to start over and abandon some of the work.
    – We didn’t apply Build-Measure-Learn methodology, which meant we wasted a lot of time as we had to rework pieces of the service bit by bit. We could have learned much faster by using a complete mockup and testing that with users. No major code development of bug fixes needed in the beginning, yet that was the first focus — not the best use of time.
    – After showing friends, we got the first 100+ testers by going to college campuses and cafes and asking people to try out our new startup. We didn’t pay people, had about a 20% hit rate and average time of 20 minutes with the person. Direct observation led us to improve our UI, but we also needed to ask the right questions. I realized afterward that while feedback from these sessions was positive and people engaged for a long time, we did not understand repeat usage, which was critical to our first version’s growth.

    – In the first business sale, I was able to partially apply customer discovery and charge before we had done the code development. But this wasn’t true customer discovery because I didn’t identify a large enough target group to make this piece of development into a sustainable business.

    Customer Validation activities
    – Develop a repeatable sales process; something that can passed on to others or automated online.

    My experience:
    – My sales came from word of mouth, referrals, and random meetings – not repeatable actions that I could control. This meant that I had difficulty growing the business.
    Your goal is to get to a repeatable sales process. Can you adequately reach (paying) customers online? Or if you use a sales force for business customer sales, what kind of business, what title/function should they target, how do they reach these people?

    Metrics
    Don’t use vanity metrics because while they look good to those who don’t know better, they don’t help you learn what is improving your startup. Here are some things to try and vanity metrics I wrongly used until I started to figure it out.
    One-off experiments that help you collect metrics and learn
    Split test (A/B test) different designs and content. Then compare how the different versions perform.

    We used Google Optimizer and a $5/day budget of Adwords to experiment with different designs.
    Doing this can teach you a lot about signup rates but is not enough, as shown from the examples below.
    Tracking user growth
    User growth looking good… But does it matter? (don’t worry that there’s no scale shown)
    Now we add another metric: the active user (usually defined as the number of users that use your service at least monthly). Uh oh…
    I saw growth in users, long single-use engagement times, but noticed that people did not frequently return. This made active user growth impossible and an unsustainable user network on which our service depended at that time.
    Getting publicity

    You may think that you just need to increase your marketing and get higher visitor numbers. So how do things change when you get publicity?

    We got written up in the New York Times. Hooray?
    This is what really happened.
    And this is what happens to a lot of startups. I didn’t expect to be covered in NYT, but getting press coverage isn’t your goal if your product still needs work. The benefit was some initial attention and words of congratulations (vanity metrics to be sure, but nice for morale).
    My overall experience:
    – Having these experiences served as great experiments for us. Since we were looking at user data we got to understand how people were truly using our service. First time use was positive and had long engagement times (what we expected from initial experiments). Repeat use was very different from what we thought (definitely not daily) and required us to change our product. We ended up moving to run themed events where people would come together at a specific time. When we eventually pivoted to a business product, this knowledge was key.

    Cohorts
    A way to show whether your product is changing for the better or worse over time is to track cohorts of users (in this example I track active users over time). First I break users into cohorts based on month they joined and then show what percentage of each cohort return month by month. This is a really important metric for most businesses.

    Line up data to start each cohort together
    Graph the data. Something is changing the user experience. In this example, users are more likely to stay active over time. This example shows that something you are doing (track your actions) is improving usage rates over time.

    No one metric tells the whole story and you can learn a lot by looking at data.

    Team
    – Often said to be the most important part of the startup. If the current vision doesn’t pan out, a good team can regroup and do something else. A good team can learn what it needs to do to be successful. A good team knows its limitations.
    My experience:
    – I like to have the team work in the same place, if not every day, at least for most of the week.
    – Arguments are ok, it’s how you handle yourself during and afterward that makes a big difference.
    – If someone isn’t working out, they must be put in another role or moved out. Postponing that difficult discussion will only bring you more headache later.
    – If someone is a talented worker but a negative force in the group, get rid of them. They are most likely not worth the pain they will create for the others.Legal
    – When you start out, it’s a good idea to put some basic things in writing. People change over time, what you remember will be different from what your partners remember; fights will happen and you will waste a ton of time thinking about these things.
    – For partners and employees with equity, a vesting schedule (e.g. your equity vests over 3 or 4 years) and a one-year cliff (anyone who leaves without working at least one year gets nothing) are both good ideas.
    My experience:
    – I got pro bono legal help. Even without that, there are standard legal templates you can use for many common needs.
    – We had all employees, interns and contractors sign contracts.
    – I personally know several startups who have had founders leave with nothing in writing. This is a common problem in the startup world (no one thinks it’s going to happen to them) but it will make your life miserable later on because of the uncertainty.

    Investors
    – The best way to raise money is to show that you have a good business and traction. Investors invest in “lines, not dots.” E.g. show progress over time; fundraising is not a one-time activity.
    – Demos are important, but not as important as having a good product and team. Practice pitching (this is more difficult than it seems).
    – Meet investors at startup events, pitch/demo events, referrals from other startups in their portfolio, Angel List (angel.co). Also look at thefunded.com for info on the investors themselves.
    – Raising money can easily take all your time for months. Only do it if needed. Nothing is guaranteed. Investors move in herds – it can be worse for you if you try but then fail to raise money.
    – The team is often said to be the most important thing an investor looks at.

    My experience:
    – I knew a bunch of other startups that tried to raise money too early and failed. That time would have been better spent working on their product.
    – Showing that you have a good product, users, people paying, are good forms of validation. Knowing why you’re succeeding (see Metrics section) shows you probably know how to duplicate this success.
    – I made an art of bootstrapping and keeping costs low where we could. Some inventive things we did: got interns in exchange for college credit, got pro bono legal services, used college campuses and Starbucks as places to test with users. Using the limited techniques we had back then, we had better results than a competitor with a 15 person team and $500K in seed money (compared to our 3 person team and $4K spend to get to launch).

    Mentors / Advisors
    – Incredibly important to your development.
    – Build in forms of accountability.
    – Find people who have done it before, not people who have brand name recognition.

    My experience:
    – I found informal mentors and advisors in people in the investment community and other startup people who had run a startup before, but wish I had done more.
    – Some people just wanted to build their status as advisors. I didn’t accept people who sought me out to advise me but didn’t have experience in the areas my startup needed.

    Be out there:
    – Be a part of startup community events, meet others, talk about your work.
    – Be a part of your user community.
    – Get covered: present, pitch, meet or pitch bloggers.

    My experience:
    – Over the last 2 years I met mentors, investors, new hires, and customers just from being out in the startup community.
    – I also spent too much time at events that weren’t really relevant for me and could have sought specialty events more.
    – I tried to choose events where I could talk to people, rather than sit in an audience and watch people.

    Well, that’s a long list. I hope it helps as you work on your own startup.

  • Selling Shovels in the New Startup Gold Rush

     

    Back during the 1849 California Gold Rush, few prospectors struck it rich. Instead, most of the people who made money back then were those who “sold shovels” (and jeans, tents, pickaxes and other supplies and services) to the prospectors who lived hard lives panning for gold. The perspectives of these two types of entrepreneurs (the shovel sellers and the prospectors) were different. The prospectors used their knowledge to stake a territorial claim and search for gold (which might or might not be discovered). Shovel sellers, on the other hand, sold to a defined market with serious needs who had money to pay.

    Two of the better known sellers of shovels and promoters of the gold rush were Levi Strauss (sold blue jeans) and Samuel Brannan (owned the general store located at Sutter’s Mill).

    You could say that the prospectors were going for broke, willing to take bigger risks, and in theory had a bigger upside. The shovel sellers were more likely to have less variance in their businesses but possibly were also less likely to strike it really rich.

    Is it any different today?

    As a comparison, a recent gold rush is the Web3 / Cryptocurrency / Memecoin / Blockchain market. While the price of various cryptocurrencies is hard to predict and subject to wild swings, the tools that companies and individuals need to be involved in that market are easier to know. Rather than buy BTC, sell miners. Rather than speculate on crypto, build a tool to help people mint NFTs. Large companies including NVIDIA, Amazon (AWS), and more focus on selling shovels.

    But as with many strategic questions, there isn’t a single answer that holds true all the time. You still need to think through it for yourself. Sometimes that’s easier than other times.

    In the Gold Rush that is the startup scene, I’ve met two classes of shovel sellers over the time I ran a startup and operated incubators and accelerators.

    Some Good or Unavoidable Shovels

    • Pay for office space, naturally. If you have an office. The number of co-working spaces exploded over the last five years. In one extreme example, there was one co-working space in Hong Kong when I moved there in 2012. There were 100 co-working spaces there by 2017. Today there are multiple co-working spaces in many cities around the world.
    • Pay for incorporating, when you do it. Unavoidable regulation but pretty cheap. While you might not incorporate until you get your work to a specific milestone, if that cost scares you, there’s something wrong.
    • Pay someone outside your startup to produce something not worth doing in-house. For example, to outsource a logo or UI design. Depending on what you’re doing, going rate anywhere from $100s to many $1000s. Just have to make sure that results are on target. There are many services that do this today. AI has changed this dramatically.
    • Pay for off-the-shelf commodity operations, such as mailing list management systems, hosting, and payments. Things that really are cheaper for other companies to do. Again, there are many options today.
    • Other newish sellers of shovels that can be good (do your due diligence) include infrastructure and devices for blockchain businesses or investors, companies that do design and packaging for food businesses (lots of growth in this industry), and growth marketing services to help startups scale their customer base.

    Bad or Completely Avoidable Shovels – Here are a few of the more interesting bad ones I’ve encountered

    I’m not talking about startups selling shovels, but rather companies that sell shovels to the startups. Some examples.
    • Pay for followers on Twitter, Facebook, and other platforms. The concept is you can instantly get thousands of followers if you pay for them. Not sure how it works. Years ago when I saw a new startup competitor of ours suddenly have 10,000 followers I wondered how that happened. They still have 10,000 today. And no one ever @ messages them. I don’t get the point. Getting these “followers” is cheap however. This is what I like to call a “bonfire sale of the vanity metrics.” I know a few people who game the system by making sure that they have tens of thousands of followers as a way to get better treatment at events (organizers assume that you command an audience when they see your follower count). That’s just not my scene.
    • Pay for @ messages. Somebody tried to sell me access to people with large numbers of Twitter followers (Twitter might not be a big deal for your industry, but there are versions of this on other platforms) who I guess then tweet out their support. I guess that’s what it was supposed to be. Never considered it. Going rate was $5,000 for 10 power Tweeters. The potential deal was offered to me in the (actual) shadows of a startup happy hour by an otherwise upstanding member of society. The world would be better off if you gave that money to charity. A friend who took the deal saw no real impact on his business.
    • Pay for introductions. The concept (from another upstanding member of society) was they would introduce me to people for money. I asked if they really meant a commission in the event of a sale, but they weren’t interested in that. They just wanted to monetize their address book. I thought this was so weird that I actually cold-called and set up meetings myself. So I channeled that one into something positive for me.
    • Pay for money. I’ve never gone out to raise money but I’ve had people request to raise money for me for a fee. When I politely tell them that I’m not fundraising it breaks their hearts. Note that many investors look unkindly on this type of work. A percent of their investment shouldn’t go to a middleman.
    • Pay for informal advice. Seems to be used mostly by those whose experience is from the ’90s bubble. Funny thing is, I usually have to fend off advice-givers. My perspective on the value of advice has also changed dramatically in the years since I wrote this post. This is obviously not the same as having a true advisor or board member who knows what they’re doing, contributes serious value, and who receives equity or other compensation.
    • Pay to pitch. Going rates I’ve heard seem to be between $150 – $500. I just think that’s wrong, like asking a band to pay to play. Well, maybe if it were a really bad band… But even the times I’ve heard of good bands paying to play, they were able to collect money at the door to recover the cost.
    • Pay to present. Slight twist on the above. Years ago I was invited to pitch my startup at a conference (for free) but then told there was a fee to present to investors. I’ll spare you the theater of the absurd conversation that followed. Again, that’s just wrong. I’ll be paid to speak publicly, not the other way around (though I have also accepted travel fees in exchange for speaking at an interesting event). Going rates between $200 – $2,000.
    • Prey on students. I received multiple messages appealing to students of the university where I teach and run the Incubator, for them to apply to a week-long entrepreneurship course in Silicon Valley (operated by another upstanding member of society). When you go to the application… there is no application, just a form for payment. But celebrities will be in attendance. Is there content beyond the speeches that have been delivered many times before? Do the participating students actually change or just feel that they changed? Do they need to pay so much for a fun week? And doesn’t their university, where they already pay tuition, already provide versions of this education? (The SV founder later gave the school’s commencement speech.)
    • Pay for rankings. On Product Hunt, for example, I received the following pitch when I posted a new product. “I just saw you guys launched on Product Hunt. Congratulations! I can help you with this. Our services: We offer a performance-based model where we’ll try to get you in the Top 3 spots for the day. 1st Spot: $2500, 2nd Spot: $2250, 3rd Spot: $2000, 4th Spot: $1750. If you place 5th spot or anything lower, our service remains completely free of charge.” This takes away the value of true audience rankings, but I can see some startups lured by it. Even as sites like Product Hunt have lost their value. Then again, if the fees work for the value of the attention you’ll get, why not?

    Watching this has been fascinating to me.

    Unlike the 1849 gold rush, when the easy gold was picked up early on, that’s not necessarily the case if you’re building a startup today. A market (and tech) often needs to develop a bit first. That’s why we sometimes talk about a first-mover disadvantage.

    After reading this post, you might think that I advocate always selling shovels and never digging for gold.

    I don’t mean that. There isn’t necessarily a single answer to what you should do. Also, the advantage can swing between selling shovels and digging for gold. At times, digging for gold is the right choice. You should absolutely go for it in those situations.

    Also, I have to say, you can also choose to dig for gold because you just prefer that lifestyle (it can be more fun than shovels) or because you have an advantage against those other prospectors.

    Hats off to you sellers of shovels for parting prospectors from their money. And to those of you looking for gold, keep your heads down.

    If you liked this, you might like to learn about the way businesses can take advantage of timing advantages, including knowing when to sell shovels and when to dig for gold. I wrote a useful book called Why Now that provides frameworks and case studies to help.
     
     


  • Are pitch events eating your brain?

    Startup pitch events are an important way to hear about other businesses and learn how to talk about your work, but many events could be improved by a little preparation.

    Too many events have judges who haven’t taken the time to learn about the startups they are judging. This could be because the organizer didn’t send any information before the event, or because the judges didn’t put the effort in beforehand. Whatever it is, it happens too often.
    That means that it’s up to the startup pitching to use a format to make it easy for the judges to quickly understand their work. You can’t affect the experience the judges have in your area of focus, but you can at least make it easy for them.
    At a recent event, one pitch I heard recently was for I thought a spectacular product. They guy had already talked to customers, made a prototype and had a business model that I liked. He just needed to express that simply. Combined with a judge who who didn’t understand the industry and focused on one small point of the entrepreneur’s plan, the communication broke down. It looked like the worst pitch of that night, but I think it was really the best business.
    Meanwhile, the best pitch that night was from a startup that had not yet been formed. No real work had been done, it was just at the concept stage.
    The world is not a pitch event but it is valuable knowing how to maneuver in that environment. So whenever you attend a pitch event, learn from the presenters. And whenever you’re there to pitch, assume that you need to educate the audience a little.
  • You can’t sing about that yet

    I remember seeing an older singer, whose life was a drama worthy of a movie, tell a younger singer struggling with a song “you’re not old enough to sing that yet.” Think about this…

    Have you tried to build something and seen it go nowhere? Been delighted when people tell you your idea is cool? Have you had your heart broken when an unheard of competitor comes out and redefines your market? Been enthralled when the first users sign up? Have you seen customers who shook hands on a contract hesitate before signing and then suddenly go on “vacation”? Been ecstatic when people start to pay for your product? Have you spent months or years working on something only to afterwards count “what we learned” as the only benefit you got? Been psyched to see people write about your work? Have you wanted to bang your head against a wall when the team fights? Been thankful when the team comes up with a great fix when you’re away?
    Well, good. Now you have a deeper understanding of business and the human condition. You couldn’t get that from a book or a blog.
    Otherwise it’s like trying to sing about love without having ever loved. You can say the words and go through the motions but your audience will know the difference.
    Combine all that with theory and intense learning and you’ve got the makings of a great entrepreneur.
    I remember telling an investor about my previous startup — that things weren’t going to work out and that we were going to move on. I said this almost with embarrassment. I’ll never forget what he said:
    “Well, congratulations. You’ve got the first one down, now you can work on something else. You didn’t really think this one was going to be the one, anyway, right? I mean, it almost never works. Your chances are less than 1 in 100. Anyway, congratulations. Now, check this new thing out I’m looking at…”
  • Why I don’t write about startup news

    When I was in college I used to spend 2 hours a day reading newspapers. I’d start with the NY Times, go to the Wall Street Journal, maybe pick up the Financial Times, El Mundo, South China Morning Post, or for kicks People’s Daily.

    Few of those news stories meant anything lasting to me. I should have spent that time talking to real people instead.
    For years now, I’ll go for days without keeping up to date on breaking news and it hasn’t made much of a difference to my work. If anything, my mind is clearer and I’m able to focus on the important. That’s why I don’t write about real startup news.
    Plus, there are plenty of other people who do it better than me; I can’t keep up with the constant updates anyway; and I think it’s better to slow down news intake.
    As Peter Drucker said in an NPR interview, it takes 20 years to really tell if a president was mostly good or bad. So even if it’s only 2 years for a startup, the deciding can take more time than the moments we have before tweeting it out.
  • What startups can learn from the May 21 Judgment Day group (the greatest startup marketing campaign I’ve ever seen)

    (And they did it during NYC TechCrunch Disrupt, too!)

     
    The greatest marketing stunt I ever saw came from a fundamentalist religious group called Family Radio. I knew about these guys over a year before Judgment Day (received a flier from a convert) but I was amazed at how much awareness they eventually got for their “event” (for lack of a better word).

    Using nothing but their daily radio show and dedicated volunteers, without any modern social networking that I saw, they got the whole country to think about the end of the world.

    I know you’re probably thinking Family Radio wasn’t a marketing stunt — they actually believed the world was ending. But for pure audacity, has any startup ever come close?

    Businesses can learn from them.

    Similar to the Family Radio crowd, while running a startup I managed to get a mix of people to believe, follow and even pay for our service, but only in pale comparison to their success: tens of millions of dollars raised, a wide-spread and active community and people who are so devoted they took it upon themselves to dress up, carry placards and spread their message.

    Every week I meet smart people who start companies with audacious goals, but none as audacious as predicting the date and time of Judgment Day and the end of the world. And yet, as crazy as their goals were, and even though no earthquakes and fire consumed the earth, Family Radio was quite the launch success — so what if what came next didn’t work. Thousands of people believed in the end and spent their time and money promoting it around the world. No A/B testing, no customer development and no beta launch (well, maybe one. Their previous Judgment Day prediction was for 1994).

    As far as I observed, this is what they did:
    – Held a daily radio show that included repeated instructions about the end of the world (dedication to daily work and dedication through tough times)

    – Provided a really clear, simple message about their beliefs (targeted a growing conservative fundamentalist market niche)

    – Understood their audience (didn’t build a fancy website or mobile app which wouldn’t matter to their audience anyway, since they listen to the radio or podcasts)

    – Built no social networking integration on their site (their members found ways to organize without it)

    – Stated an audacious and clear goal (got everyone excited about one really big thing, not many little things)

    I want to build a startup that can appeal to people like that. But be right.

    While they did a lot of damage, for their marketing success they deserve some respect.


    [this post written earlier, reposted here]
  • How to be worth your 0%

    I was contacted to be a mentor for a graduating student who wanted to work at a startup, something I was happy to do. But the first question he asked me when we met was “What percentage equity should I get? Because I don’t want to get screwed.”


    I almost ended the meeting right then.

    If your first thoughts are about how to get what you think you deserve in equity, then maybe you’re going into this for the wrong reasons. If you have minimal experience to boot, that’s even worse.

    But I did finally suggest a nice round number. Zero percent.

    The chance that equity you are granted is worth anything is slim enough. So you better work somewhere that you’d be excited about, learning and happy, even if you got 0%.

    Funny thing is, when the meeting with that student finally ended I’m sure he went away thinking, “man, what’s Paul’s problem?”

    Never heard from him again. Don’t be that guy.
  • The questions you ask determine the answers you get

    I recently participated in a brainstorming group to help a friend generate ideas for her startup.

    First of all, it was a lot of fun. My friend had the session led by a creative brainstorming trainer (who ended up being quite good), organized it very well and I think got a lot out of it. I’m looking forward to seeing what she applies to her business.But one part of the session sticks in my mind. We brainstormed solutions to several questions and I realized that the way the questions were framed influenced how people responded. This is an obvious point, but since I’ve been on the asking side for a while I forgot what it was like to be the one answering the questions.

    One question related to her business was “how do I get people to buy tickets?” (which is her business model).

    I found that I had trouble answering the question because I had already assumed that the individuals would not be the sole purchasers of tickets and that the revenue would come from other participants or sponsors.

    Now, if the question had been “how do I generate revenue?” or “who has this problem?” the results would be very different. When I think back to my own experience demoing my startup for people in cafes, I made the mistake of not understanding how people would or wouldn’t become repeat users.

    When I first went out, I focused on whether people enjoyed using the service, how long they used it, whether they had any problems with the design. I saw that users played with our service for quite a long time, which was surprising to me. But since these were all one-off demos with people, it took me a while before I realized that while people played with the service for a long time, they also didn’t return for weeks or months afterward.

    That was a very important behavior to learn, but it took much longer than needed.

    Once we learned it, we then approached selling to users in a very different way and got our first business clients. I’ve tried to remember that lesson ever since.

  • Get new posts by email A few times per year. Deep dives into tech, unit economics, timing, and more.